Description
- Objective
In this assignment, you will implement in C++ five sorting algorithms: selection sort, insertion sort, bubble sort, Shell sort, and radix sort. You will test your code using varied input cases, record compu-tational time and the number of comparisons in each sort algorithm, and compare these computational results with the theoretical running time of the algorithms using Big-O asymptotic notation.
- General Guidelines
- This project can be done in groups of at most four students. Please use the cover sheet at the previous page for your report.
- The supplementary program is packed in 221-A2-code.tar which can be downloaded from eCampus. You need to “untar” the file using the following command on a Linux machine:
tar xfv 221-A2-code.tar
It will create the directory 221-A2-code.
- Make sure that your code can be compiled using a C++ compiler running on a Linux machine before submission because your programs will be tested on such a machine. Use Makefile provided in the directory to compile C++ files by typing the following command:
make
You may clean your directory with this command:
make clean
- When you run your program on a Linux machine, use Ctrl+C (press Ctrl with C together) to stop the program. Do NOT use Ctrl+Z, as it just suspends the program and does not kill the process. We do not want to see the department server down because of this assignment.
- Supplementary reading
- Lecture note: Introduction to Analysis of Algorithms
- Lecture note: Sorting in Linear Time
- Submission guidelines
- Electronic copy of all your code tested on 15 types of input integer sequences (but do not submit your test files), and reports in L_{Y}X/L^{A}T_{E}X and PDF format should be in the directory 221-A2-code. This command typed in the directory 221-A2-code will create the tar file (221-A2-code-submit.tar) for the submission to eCampus:
make tar
- Your program will be run and tested on TA’s input files.
- Skeleton Code: Description and Implementation
- In this assignment, the sort program reads a sequence of integers either from the screen (standard input) or from a file, and outputs the sorted sequence to the screen (standard output) or to a file. The program can be configured to show total running time and/or total number of comparisons done by the specific sort algorithm.
- (20 points) Rewrite the provided code using the STL vector instead of the dynamic array A used in the code. Check if your new code compiles.
- This program does not have a menu but takes arguments from the command line. The code for interface is completed in the skeleton program, so you only have to know how to execute the program using the command line.
2
The program usage is as follows. Note that options do not need to be specified in a fixed order. You do not need to list all the options in the command line. Do not enter brackets (see Examples).
Usage:
./sort [-a ALGORITHM] [-f INPUTFILE] [-o OUTPUTFILE] [-h] [-d] [-p] [-t] [-T] [-c] [-r]
Examples of using the options:
./sort -h
./sort -a S -f input.txt -o output.txt -d -t -c -p
./sort -a I -t -c
./sort
Description of the options:
-a ALGORITHM: Use ALGORITHM to sort.
ALGORITHM is a single character representing an algorithm:
S for selection sort
B for bubble sort
I for insertion sort
H for shell sort
R for radix sort
-f INPUTFILE: Obtain integers from INPUTFILE instead of STDIN
-o OUTPUTFILE: Place output data into OUTPUTFILE instead of STDOUT
-h: Display this help and exit
-d: Display input: unsorted integer sequence
-p: Display output: sorted integer sequence
-t: Display running time of the chosen algorithm in milliseconds using clock()
-T: Display running time of the chosen algorithm in milliseconds using the chrono class
-c: Display number of comparisons (excluding radix sort)
-r: Provide the number of repeated runs for the sort (default=1)
- Format of the input data. The first line of the input contains a numbern which is the number of integers to sort. Subsequent n numbers are written one per line which are the numbers to sort. Here is an example of input data where 5 is the number of integers to sort
5
7 -8 4 0 -2
- Format of the output data. The sorted integers are printed one per line in increasing order.Here is the output corresponding to the above input:
-8 -2 0 4 7
- (25 points) Your tasks include implementation of the following five sorting algorithms in corre-sponding cpp files.
- selection sort in selection-sort.cpp
- insertion sort in insertion-sort.cpp
- bubble sort in bubble-sort.cpp
- Shell sort in shell-sort.cpp
3
- radix sort in radix-sort.cpp
- The radix algorithm should sort unsigned integers in the range from 0 to (2^{16}− 1).
- The radix sort can be applied to negative numbers using this input modification:
“You can shift input to get non-negative numbers, sort the data, and shift back to the original data”
- (10 points) In order to test the algorithms generate (one by one) input cases of the sizes 10^{2}, 10^{3}, 10^{4}, and 10^{5}integers in three diﬀerent orders
- random order
- increasing order
- decreasing order
HINT: The standard library <cstdlib> provides functions srand() and rand() to generate random numbers.
- (10 points) Modify code (excluding the radix sort) to count the number of comparisons per-formed on input integers. The following tips should help you with determining how manycomparisons are performed.
- You will measure 3 times for each algorithm (use -r 3) on each sequence
- Use a variable (called num_cmps) to keep track of the number of comparisons, typically in if or loop statements
- Remember that C++ uses the shortcut rule for evaluating boolean expressions. A way to count comparisons accurately is to use the comma expression. For example,
while (i < n && (num_cmps++, a[i] < b))
HINT: If you modify sort.cpp and run several sorting algorithms subsequently, you have to call resetNumCmps() to reset number of comparisons between every two calls to s->sort().
- To time each sorting algorithm, you use the function clock() and the C++ class chrono (see the options -t and -T). You need to compare these two timings and discuss it in your report.
- Here is the example of how to use the function clock(). The timing part for clock() is completed in the skeleton program.
The example of using clock():
#include <ctime>
…
clock_t t1, t2;
t1 = clock(); // start timing
…
/_{*} operations you want to measure the running time _{*}/ …
t2 = clock(); // end of timing
double diff = (double)(t2 – t1)_{*}1000/CLOCKS_PER_SEC; cout << “The timing is ” << diff << “ ms” << endl;
- You can find information about the class chrono on this website: http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/chrono/
- Report (35 points)
Write a report that includes all following elements in your report.
- (2 points) A brief description of assignment purpose, assignment description, how to run your programs, what to input and output.
- (3 points) Explanation of splitting the program into classes and providing a description andfeatures of C++ object oriented programming and/or generic programming were used in this as-signment.
- (5 points) Briefly describe the features of each of the five sorting algorithms.
4
- (5 points) Theoretical Analysis.Theoretically analyze the time complexity of the sorting algorithms with input integers in decreasing, random and increasing orders and fill the second table. Fill in the first table with the time complexity of the sorting algorithms when inputting the best case, average case and worst case. Some of the input orders are exactly the best case, average case and worst case of the sorting algorithms. State what input orders correspond to which cases. You should use big-O asymptotic notation when writing the time complexity (running time).
Complexity | best | average | worst | Complexity | inc | ran | dec | ||
Selection Sort | Selection Sort | ||||||||
Insertion Sort | Insertion Sort | ||||||||
Bubble Sort | Bubble Sort | ||||||||
Shell Sort | Shell Sort | ||||||||
Radix Sort | Radix Sort |
inc: increasing order; dec: decreasing order; ran: random order
- (15 points)
- Briefly describe the experiments. Present the experimental running times (RT) and number of comparisons (#COMP) performed on input data using the following tables.
RT | Selection Sort | Insertion Sort | Bubble Sort | ||||||||||||||||
n | inc | ran | dec | inc | ran | dec | inc | ran | dec | ||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||||||||||
10^{3} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{4} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{5} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
RT | Shell Sort | Radix Sort | |||||||||||||||||
n | inc | ran | dec | inc | ran | dec | |||||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||||||||||
10^{3} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{4} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{5} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
#COMP | Selection Sort | Insertion Sort | |||||||||||||||||
n | inc | ran | dec | inc | ran | dec | |||||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||||||||||
10^{3} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{4} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{5} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
#COMP | Bubble Sort | Shell Sort | |||||||||||||||||
n | inc | ran | dec | inc | ran | dec | |||||||||||||
100 | |||||||||||||||||||
10^{3} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{4} | ^{ } | ||||||||||||||||||
10^{5} | ^{ } |
inc: increasing order; dec: decreasing order; ran: random order
- For each of the five sort algorithms, graph the running times over the three input cases (inc, ran, dec) versus the input sizes (n); and for each of the first four algorithms graph the numbers of comparisons versus the input sizes, totaling in 9 graphs.
HINT: To get a better view of the plots, use logarithmic scales for both x and y axes.
- To compare performance of the sorting algorithms you need to have another 3 graphs to plot the results of all sorts for the running times for eachof the input cases (inc, ran, dec) separately.
HINT: To get a better view of the plots, use logarithmic scales for both x and y axes.
- (3 points) Comment on how the experimental results relate to the theoretical analy-sis and explain any discrepancies you notice. Is your computational results match the theoretical
5
analysis you learned from class or textbook? Justify your answer. Also compare radix sort running time with the running time of four comparison-based algorithms.
- (2 points) Give your observations and conclusion. For instance, which sorting algorithm seems to perform better on which case? Do the experimental results agree with the theoretical analysis you learned from class or textbook? What factors can aﬀect your experimental results?
6